Robert asks the shelf one uncomfortable question

Board Game Collection Audit and Table Selector

Score games by player-count fit, teach burden, setup time, replay demand, last played, sentimental value, replacement difficulty, and whether anyone actually asks for them.

Saveable field deskReviewed Free · no account
Share this desk
Share this curiosity
Robert, The Keeper RobertThe Keeper

Answer first

What this tool solves before the table opens.

Use it for

Score games by player-count fit, teach burden, setup time, replay demand, last played, sentimental value, replacement difficulty, and whether anyone actually asks for them.

Start here

Find what the group will play now Filter by real player count, teach tolerance, time, and who actively asks for the game.

What you leave with

A restorable case log with XP, trauma, chaos-bag state, and the next setup action

Your working copy

Mark it here. This browser remembers.

0 of 3 ready

Need more precision?

Start simple. Add detail only when the table needs it.

The tool above already gives a usable answer. These modes add campaign, serious-table, or expert checks without erasing your work.

Fast, legal, playable

Find what the group will play now

Filter by real player count, teach tolerance, time, and who actively asks for the game.

  • Record best real count
  • Name the game champion
  • Create a play-soon shelf

Optional session label

Ready when

Every keep, play-soon, sell, donate, or archive decision has one honest reason tied to table demand, sentiment, replacement difficulty, or use.

What this tool assumes

A collection is not an efficiency contest. Sentimental and archival value are valid when named openly.
Current authorityBoardGameGeek: collection and play logging fields →

Robert's table briefing

The tool has a point of view. The rules still get the final word.

“A shelf is allowed to keep memories. It is not required to keep excuses.”

Robert is the fictional cabinet voice presenting this desk. Robert Pruitt owns the research, source review, and editorial judgment; the linked publisher material remains authoritative.

Share this curiosity
Robert presenting the Collection Audit in a themed Puzzlewick editorial scene
Curator field scene Editorial atmosphere for Collection Audit; not rules or product evidence.
Collection Audit decision and setup visual
Decision visual Use the live fields above for your own table; verify exact components against the cited authority.

Physical table kit

The exact products this desk is talking about.

Real product photographs and exact retailer pages from the related Puzzlewick buying guides. Products are optional unless the tool explicitly identifies a required foundation.

Puzzlewick may earn from qualifying purchases, including as an Amazon Associate, at no extra cost to you. Prices and availability change at checkout.

Puzzlewick field cards

The useful part belongs beside the board.

01

Play signal

Track demand, not guilt

Last played matters, but “who asks for it?” is more useful. A seasonal favorite can deserve a shelf despite low annual plays.

  • Record best real player count
  • Separate teach time from play time
  • Mark the person who champions it
Use
02

Keep signal

Sentimental and irreplaceable are valid

A collection is not an efficiency contest. Mark memories, signed copies, out-of-print editions, and family history openly rather than disguising them as strategy value.

  • Display pieces can earn display space
  • A replacement cost is not a resale value
  • Keep one reason, not five excuses
Meaning
03

Exit signal

Move duplicates and dead formats first

Duplicate editions, incomplete expansion systems, games no current group enjoys, and boxes replaced by a definitive edition are the cleanest exits.

  • Redirect old guide URLs; do not create reader dead ends
  • Donate teachable games with complete components
  • Photograph and inventory before selling
Prune

Keep the useful version

Print it, download it, or send it to the table.

The downloaded field note includes your selections and checklist state. Private notes stay in this browser unless you download them.

Rules, evidence, and compliance

What this desk follows—and where it stops.

01

Official authority

BoardGameGeek: collection and play logging fields

02

Community layer

Recurring player friction informs the workflow; it never overrides published rules or product identity.

03

Scope boundary

A collection is not an efficiency contest. Sentimental and archival value are valid when named openly.

04

Expert table

This mode records a reproducible high-skill table without pretending the game has a tournament structure.

Open the current authority: BoardGameGeek: collection and play logging fields →

Fast rulings before the table

Common questions, answered without the forum fog.

Should an unplayed sentimental game be removed?

Not automatically. Sentimental, archival, signed, family, and irreplaceable value are valid when named honestly and given intentional space.

What should leave first?

Duplicate editions, incomplete systems, dead formats, replaced boxes, and games no current group requests are the cleanest first exits.

Is the Collection Audit an official publisher tool?

No. It is an independent Puzzlewick planning aid checked against BoardGameGeek: collection and play logging fields. When the tool and current publisher material differ, the publisher rulebook, FAQ, errata, or event packet controls.

How current is the Collection Audit?

Its evidence date is 2026-08-18. Recheck the linked current authority after a new edition, FAQ, points update, rotation, app update, or event packet.

The fortune-teller's table

Dax has read three for you

“I don't usually believe in this. But the ball's rarely wrong, and it picked three. Look.”— Dax, The Critic