Earthborne Rangers in 2026: It Is In Stock — Everyone Is Just Looking in the Wrong Shop

Earthborne Games is a small publisher in St. Paul, Minnesota, founded in 2020 by Andrew Navaro — previously head of studio at Fantasy Flight Games. They make one beautiful thing very carefully, and they have made an unusual distribution choice: they do not sell their own game.

Their website has no cart, no shop, and no prices anywhere in it. What it has is a set of doors. Covenant handles the US and Canada. Naylor Games handles the UK and Europe. There is also a partner for custom playmats, a Teemill shop for apparel, and a Bandcamp page for the soundtrack — which tells you something lovely about the kind of company this is, and nothing at all about where to buy the game.

Here is what a live read of Covenant showed: Core Set (Second Printing), $100, in stock, "Ships within 1 business day." Every current expansion in stock beside it. Naylor lists the core at £85. Zatu in the UK has had it in stock at a discount to RRP.

Meanwhile the Amazon listing (ASIN B0CNY46WJL) reads unavailable with no seller, Miniature Market shows SKU EBR001 out of stock, and Noble Knight has been dry since April. None of that is a shortage. It is a distribution model meeting a search habit, and losing.

One honest caution before you click. Two independent live reads of Naylor disagreed with each other on stock. Small publishers with two channels move quickly. Check the page yourself, and treat every figure here as a snapshot dated 2 August 2026 rather than a promise.

Yes, completely, and the community is unusually united about this.

The Core Set (Second Printing) gives you 540 cards, 35 dividers, 92 punchboard tokens, the rulebook, and the Lure of the Valley campaign guide with its record sheet, in a box about 9.4 by 12.6 by 3.4 inches. That campaign runs fifteen to twenty-five in-game days — most people land between eighteen and twenty-two — which works out at roughly twenty to forty hours.

No expansion is required. The standard advice you will see repeated kindly and often is: play through Day 6 before you buy anything else. There is a good reason for that specific number. The first few days are you learning the valley's rhythm; by Day 6 you know whether the game's particular pleasure — wandering, noticing, tending, rather than winning — is a pleasure for you.

And that is the real question here, more than any expansion decision. Earthborne Rangers has no lose condition. You cannot fail it. If that sounds like a missing feature, this may not be your game. If it sounds like a relief, you are going to love it.

Before you buy, you can read the whole rulebook. Earthborne publishes the complete Core Set rulebook as a free PDF, and maintains a living rules FAQ plus a downloads page with campaign trackers and an interactive character sheet. For a hundred-dollar box, an evening with the actual rules is the best due diligence available — and it is free.

This is where owner data is worth more than any reviewer's opinion, including mine. BoardGameGeek publishes how many people own each item, and against 12,293 core-set owners the attachment rates tell a very clear story.

28.3% own Legacy of the Ancestors. 25.6% own Stewards of the Valley. 23.3% own the next item down. And then it falls off a cliff — 7.3%, 6.4% and 3.2% for the three newest Valley boxes.

That is not a gentle taper. That is a community that bought two things and stopped, and it maps almost exactly onto what those two things are.

Stewards of the Valley ($40) is the closest thing to essential. It is 193 cards and 14 dividers, and it adds a whole new Talespinner background and Spirit Speaker specialty — meaning it changes who you can *be* in the valley, not just where you can go. It is also the best-rated thing in the line at 8.62 across 180 ratings. If you buy one expansion, buy this one.

Legacy of the Ancestors ($70) is the full second campaign — 281 cards, its own campaign guide, map and record sheet, taking you underground into the Ancient Estian Arcology. It is a sequel, not a supplement. Play the main story first.

The Valley Expansions — Spire in Bloom and Shadow of the Storm, $45 each — are mini-campaigns that slot before, during or after the main story. They are lovely and they are optional, and the 7.3% and 6.4% attachment rates suggest owners agree. Two more are already named in the fine print of another product: Into the Maw and Sky and Smoke, confirming a four-box roadmap.

Two small items that punch above their price. Moments in the Valley ($20) is 33 cards of small narrative beats. And the one genuinely important cheap purchase: the Card Errata and Divider Pack, $5 — which is only for people who own a first printing. If that is you, five dollars brings your copy current. Do not buy the $100 box again.

This is the single best predictor of whether you will finish this game, and it deserves more thought than it usually gets.

Earthborne Rangers has a reputation as a solo game. Its own player poll on BoardGameGeek says something slightly different: best at two players, recommended at one to three. That is worth sitting with if you are buying it for solitary evenings.

The split among solo players is between running one Ranger and running two-handed. One Ranger is intimate and quick; you inhabit a single person walking through a valley. Two-handed gives you the card interplay the deck-building actually wants, at the cost of a bigger table and the constant small friction of switching between two people action by action.

There is no wrong answer, and — this is the kindest design decision in the game — you can add or drop a Ranger mid-campaign. Start with one. If the valley feels thin, add another. Nothing breaks.

At the other end, three and four players is where practicality bites. Sessions run two to three and a half hours, and much of the game is quiet individual noticing. It works. It is just not what the game is best at, and a four-player group is the one configuration where people report drifting away.

It ends, properly, and this matters because a lot of open-world games do not.

A campaign runs fifteen to twenty-five in-game days, most commonly eighteen to twenty-two, at roughly twenty to forty hours total. A solo session is anywhere from forty-five minutes to two and a half hours depending on how much you linger. Three or four players runs two to three and a half hours.

The ending is a real mission-based climax with multiple branches — not a timer quietly expiring, which is the failure mode of a lot of sandbox games. Mission timers do exist, and they exist precisely to stop you stalling in the meadow forever, which, believe me, is a genuine temptation.

The honest dissent, and I would rather you hear it from me: several players report that the different endings do not feel very different from one another. If you are the kind of player who replays a campaign hunting for divergent conclusions, temper that expectation. The variety in this game is in the journey — which paths you walked, who you met, what you chose to tend — far more than in the final page.

These three get compared constantly and the comparisons are usually unhelpful, so let me be concrete about what actually differs.

Against Arkham Horror LCG. They share deck-construction DNA and almost nothing else. Arkham has a far deeper card pool, experience-point progression, and it is genuinely hard — you will lose scenarios. Earthborne is more permissive and has no lose condition at all. The value argument favours Earthborne heavily: one $100 box against what a comparable Arkham collection costs. The counter-argument is real too — Arkham gives more replay per hour, because losing creates stories and re-attempts. If you want to be tested, Arkham. If you want to be somewhere, Earthborne.

Against Sleeping Gods. Both use a book as a board and both are about exploring. But Sleeping Gods tells you written vignettes — authored, discrete, read aloud. Earthborne generates emergent narrative from systems: the weather, the terrain, the beings you meet and how you treat them. Sleeping Gods is a storybook. Earthborne is a place.

And the warning I would want given to me: this is not a combat game, and enjoyment correlates strongly with willingness to roleplay a little. If you sit down determined to optimise, the valley will feel like arithmetic. If you sit down willing to be a person walking through it, it becomes something quite rare.

The box in shops today is explicitly the Second Printing, funded on Gamefound in 2024 — a campaign that raised $3,588,887 from 15,560 backers. The original was a Kickstarter in 2021 that raised over $450,000 and reached retail around 2023.

If you own that first printing, your upgrade is the $5 Card Errata and Divider Pack. Thirty-six dividers and the corrected cards. That is the entire decision — a five dollar fix, not a hundred dollar rebuy.

Now the part that makes this game unusual on a shelf. Earthborne's production brief is plastic-free and FSC-certified: 100% FSC paper, no plastic coatings, no shrink wrap, vegetable-based inks, and everything except the rulebook staples is recyclable or compostable. Even the miniatures hold the line — the Ranger minis are cast from lead-free reclaimed pewter.

There is a real trade-off in that, and I would rather name it than let you discover it. Uncoated cards wear faster than plastic-coated ones. That is the whole sleeving debate in this community, and it is a genuine fork: sleeve them and you protect a game you may play for years, or leave them bare and accept that a well-loved copy will look well-loved. Neither is wrong. I would sleeve, but I understand entirely why someone who bought this game specifically for its principles would not want to wrap it in plastic.

One last thing, since it is the most common reason people delay: Earthborne Trailblazer is a separate standalone game, not an expansion. Its Kickstarter closed on 16 June 2026 at $549,130 from 3,969 backers, and it is not currently purchasable. It is not a reason to wait.